Recent Boardgames (Your Last Played Game Volume 2)

The instructions state the L junction can be used in either direction. I am assuming they did not want to clutter up space on the dice with junctions in both directions.

I have noticed a bit of downtime if my opponent thinks a bit too hard about what they are doing, but nothing too excessive. And I just can’t be upset at a game if a player overthinking their move makes the game drag. May as well be upset at it if a player cheats at it. The problem is with the player, not the game.

2 Likes

Played the first “real” scenario of Chronicles of Crime: 2400 on my own today. Playing solo was… a little sad, but that’s a personal issue (also a personnel issue, but that’s a lame joke), no fault of the game.

It was okay! I made one stumble when I went to solve the case (I had the evidence I required, but I forgot to analyze it with the assistant to unlock its specifics, but for whatever reason the game let me do it over. I ended up with a final score of 105/100.

I liked it! I still have a few niggles, but it felt… satisfying. I think I have 3 more mysteries to go… curious to see how they work out.

Also, found this one way easier than the tutorial, but also way bigger in scope. Still, a very satisfying experience.

Now if I could just get the silly 3D glasses to stop shifting and making my eyes hurt…

2 Likes

Wait, what? Is that a game component?

1 Like

I mean sure it’s down to player preference if you don’t mind it. It’s still a boring feeling to have to experience which is not ideal in an entertainment (I think this is compounded by the lack of being able to do anything at all while waiting and creating an anticipation because there’s all these horrid gaps to be filled).

And if I’m going to hurl abuse at a think for making me wait, I’m going to pick the inanimate object over the person, especially as I know that waiting isn’t that much of a problem in games for us.

Lucky Duck Games sell 3d glasses (they have a real mid- 90s Futuroscope vibe) that you can use with the mobile app.

2 Likes

But everyone is playing with the same randomness so it doesn’t make a difference?

1 Like

Note to self: Chronicles of Crime: Noooooooo. Nope. Nuh uh.

1 Like

They are totally optional. You can turn it off and use the phone with or without positional data (ie: looking around as if your phone is a visor).

I will say the 3D elements are done really, really well. Very immersive. But the glasses aren’t designed for my phone (the place they sit hits one of the volume buttons), so I have to put them on loosely, and therefore they shift, and the moment they shift it goes really wonky. It’s a shame, really.

I may pick up one of those cardboard phone-holder-things. Because, as mentioned, the 3D is done really well.

1 Like

Yes.

The first choices you make can be broadly equally logical but arbitrarily damaging in the long run.

Two more training games of Mind MGMT tonight. I brought up the suggestion of the app but my wife said that she had really enjoyed the previous session so we just did 1v1with switching sides again. Agents won both times (although it was close on my go because I made some assumptions I shouldn’t have). We are definitely ready to graduate to the full game, where the edge may tip more towards the Recruiter. But we’ll see! I’ll be playing the Agents - I think it’ll be a lot of fun to have the features play a bigger role.

3 Likes

I’m gonna use this as motivation to get our sessions rolling again. We got stuck on a few new games recently but it’s time to kick off the training wheels.

4 Likes

Last few days have seen myself and one other start to repel the Hapsburg Monarchy from invading Spirit Island. Only played against levels 1&2 so far. They seem a fun adversary overall, not as brutal as the British ones but definitely thinky and change up plenty about the game. Of note to me has more been using the aspects for the base game low complexity spirits. Used one aspect with each of the 4 so far between us. They do quite a good job changing up what the spirit does and how you think about it. All the complexity increase is real so worthwhile I’d say for the more experienced Spirit Islander.

Also met @lalunaverde and played another excellent game of Terra Mystica. Finaihed just in last and felt I through it away turn 4 with some sloppy sequencing and overreaching for something that wasn’t too valuable.

Lastly we tried out Codex Naturalis which was a reasonably enjoyable spatial little card game. A touch arbitrary but fun for rounding the evening off.

5 Likes

I’ve been muddling my way through a game of Feudum using The Queen’s Army this morning, and I’ve been pleasantly surprised with how much I’ve retained from my playthrough last year. Things have been moving smoothly, even with the new-to-me solo rules included, though I had been forgetting to remove epoch tiles and feed my pawns each round rather than each epoch change. This means that 90 minutes in, I’m just now moving onto the second epoch. :grimacing:

I’ve also basically been losing since round three, so dragging things out has really only served to extend my beating. This “AI” is crushingly hard and I think it would be enough of a challenge for an experienced Feudum player, but taking on the dread queen while also trying to learn to play effectively is brutal. With that said, the system presented is dynamic (and flexible) yet has elements of predictability, so I can see this turning into a worthy pursuit for dedicated solo players.

Despite the slow rake over the coals, I’m really enjoying myself and definitely plan to keep at this for a while. Feudum is a difficult game and a real bear at times, but it’s so endlessly fascinating that I’m happy to have an alternative method of experiencing it.


Game state at dawn of epoch II

10 Likes

Things like this is why I really need to get my garage cleaned out: so I can uncover our old dining room table and be able to set up longer games out there and play them as we can, without needing to worry about packing them away because the kids would destroy them.

5 Likes

Well I finished up this morning (both sessions have been in the wee early hours), so I only took up our dining room table for a “working” day. Other games have definitely monopolized space for longer, although few are so thorough about it.

This was an amazing solo experience. I lost badly enough to get beheaded, but the extra time from my early flubs with the epoch tiles meant more time to see how the Queen works. The mechanism by which she operates is simple, but highly bespoke; it takes the best elements of an action deck (quick, dynamic) and a flowchart (comprehensive, “smart”) by using 5 distinct action decks which are drawn from in sequence, mimicking the normal game’s central mechanism. Once a few peculiarities with her actions (which also mirror the player’s) are internalized, the game flows naturally.

Oh, did I mention she cheats? She gets unlimited resources, auto-wins battles where she has a knight, has all the travel goodies (but still won’t hesitate to steal yours), two extra super-pawns, needs not feed her people and auto-completes her Royal Writs.

Anyway, it’s a big game so there’s always a LOT to talk about after a session, but I’ll leave it at that. I’m delighted that this has proven an enjoyable way to experience the game and will be giving it another shot soon (assuming my partner doesn’t want in). I plan to host—and teach!—a game in the near future, so as a side perk I’ll have a more comprehensive understanding of the rules and their circular nature.

Here’s a shot of the end state. One more round would have made a huge impact on the final scores.

[EDIT] I wanted to add that I made my final error in the last round. I had been operating on the idea that the game ended when two epoch tiles stacks were empty, but in fact it’s only one. I ended the game correctly, but not until after I had made choices assuming at least one more round. A mistake that only impacted me here, but would have been something of a fiasco if I was with a table of invested players.

8 Likes

We had a game of Llamaland with friends who came over to eat the waffles I made and pick up 2 trees of my Christmas Tree forest. This was my first multiplayer and it went nicely. Took a bit longer than it should have because the kid playing with us was distracted by her brother playing on the PS5 and her mom exhibiting small amounts of AP—to win the game.

I think it is one of those games that is just thinky enough as a puzzle to make for an interesting turn. It is not the type of game I will play often enough to get really good at because the puzzle is not that compelling. But it is taught quickly enough, is accessible and has a neutral theme. Just the right thing to play with a family on a Saturday afternoon when one of the kids asks if we can play a game “because games are what’s special here” (I think her brother would say it is the PS5 though)

6 Likes

Had a wonderful birthday game day with a ton of people. At one point we had 3 separate games going on!

Played Codenames, Letter Jam, and Sleuth, but the highlight for me was definitely a five-player game of Nusfjord, which was so funny. A bunch of people had issued shares and clearly everyone wanted to buy the lot, but whenever someone would get just enough gold, someone else would go “Well I have to issue another share” and drive up the price even more. Also my friend kept wanting to use his elders, but there wouldn’t be any fish on the banquet table. So he would use his turn to serve a lot of fish… only for everyone else to use their elders and for him to be out of luck when it got back to him.

10 Likes

Gaming roundup for this week:

Concordia, got this to the table with some buddies this week, we played with salt and the Forum on the Hispania map. Was a great game, the two of us in the lead were neck and neck till he pulled ahead at the last minute by nabbing the Concordia card. I’m not sold on the Forum cards - they’re interesting sure, but felt a little unnecessary as an addition… Eh the others said they thought they were great, so maybe it’s just me.

Three Sisters, my copy of this arrived fresh from Kickstarter this week, and have got it to the table twice - once solo and once with a friend. The first game I was a little unclear on how some aspects of it were meant to work. Can’t say I was thrilled with the rulebook either, there’s some important rules buried in paragraphs of text. Maybe it would’ve clicked faster if I’d played Fleet:the Dice Game (but I’m still trying to track down a copy of that one…) But by game two, it all came together. Combo-tastic is an understatement with this game! I went heavy into goods and perrenials, which paid off with a decent lead at the end. Lots of fun, a bit easier to get to the table than Hadrian’s Wall, but still super fun and satisfying. I might like Hadrian more atm but they’re both great.

Metro X, taught this one to my wife when she was laid up with back troubles as a game that she could play without moving. Was fun - she really enjoyed it and gave me a good run for my money. Some good points on transfers gave me the win, but I suspect our next game will be super tight!

Love Letter, a couple of games of the new 2019 version of this classic. I like the improvements to the production in this version, and the Chancellor is fun but I’m not sold on the Spy cards with 2 players. Seems like it injects some more luck into a game that was already lucky. I get that they’re mostly there for games with larger playcounts though, and suspect they’d work better with more than two players.

Schotten Totten, got to break out this one for the first time with a mate. Lots of fun, I think we played 4 games back to back. Still haven’t tried the tactics cards, but the game as it is I find super engaging.

Fantasy Realms, couple of games of this new addition to the collection. It’s fun, if a little hard to tell how players are doing during the game (at least for novices like us). I suspect repeat plays with the same group will make it easier to tell how you’re going before things are over. The scoring is a pain but there’s more than one app for that to make it a little easier. I think in future I’ll make sure people offer a description of their fantasy realm at the end, to inject that little bit more flavor.

Azul, after round one I felt I was doing pretty well, which is unusual for me. But clearly my mid and late game efforts were lackluster as I ended up with a score like half of my opponents. I obviously don’t get how to play this game, but others like it so it remains in the collection.

Nut, couple of games of this one – they were both tight and tense, but I was particularly pleased with the network I built around a couple of wilds early on in one game, which gave me the win.

Roll Player, lost this one off the back of just not getting enough dice of my colour :frowning: I did decently despite that but, my opponent managed all his background goals (I was one short) so partially outplayed, partially annoyed at my bad luck.

6 Likes

Had our usual gaming couple, we will call them J and C, over for a small birthday party for our younger kiddo. Since it was also J’s birthday soon, we went ahead and let him pick what game we played, so we had a game of Lords of Waterdeep, 5 players when my wife’s brother, K, joined in. We also included the Skullport expansion, which adds the Corruption mechanic.

We don’t play this with a full crew very often, and even less so with Corruption, so it felt pretty different than usual, and that mixed with being sore and tired really threw off my wife’s game, who is usually near the top of the scoring, but came last in this game. Though to be fair to her, once she realized she would not win, she started having fun accruing Corruption and trying out some new strategies.

J and I were vying for first, when K made a couple of big plays to jump into the lead. Things went back and forth from there, and the other two players started catching up, but by the end of the game, K managed to pull ahead and be the only player to pass 100 points, getting 102. C came in second with 95, her husband J just behind at 93. I had 86, and my wife, with all her Corruption, got knocked back to 52.

Then later that night, I soloed a couple of games of The Bloody Inn. I did not do too great on either game, scoring 144 in the first and only 130 in the second. In the second game I had made a pretty decent engine, with two room service tokens getting me 4 points on average at the beginning of each turn, but I got kinda screwed by a large quantity of police in the deck. Near the end I had two high value corpses, but needed to launder money to make room on the income track, but police kept coming to the Inn, forcing me to keep Bribing them, which then cost me income at the end of the turn. Was finally able to launder, and then was able to bury both corpses on the very last turn, so at least I did not lose the game. Still, would have done much better if the police presence had been less.

3 Likes

I have a couple of games to report. We had my b’day party on Saturday, and even though we did not play a game (it was soooo hot inside the house) we definitely are thinking of having a fortnightly night of games between 4 of us. Architects did impress them.

So I had a solo game on hard mode Sunday night again. The bot this time trounced me 50 something to 38 ( I stopped adding when it was an obvious that I had no hope).

Yesterday I went back to or Game Guild Night, that had been cancelled due to COVID restrictions for what it felt like ages. They had re-started (with vaccination passes being checked) on last Monday, but I could not go. It felt so great to see the tables full of games again. I played Unfathomable, and it did impress me very positively. I think so far is my favourite hidden traitor game. I was the traitor, but with a cultist, not a hybrid, so I had to wait for the boat to reach 12 travel points, and then make the boat fail.

So to that level of difficulty for the traitor (later we realised that the owner should have just kept hybrids on the cards as per our game count) I was not too bad. I was considering revealing that I was the traitor as soon as we hit 12, but not knowing which are the advantages was tricky. My character was the Magic Tome keeper, which did help, but the last 3 mythos cards I fell short to jeopardize. Our lower counter was at three ( I think we had two at that level) and the boat was a bit damaged, but there was not enough time for me to make it fail. So I did not succeed to bring the trip to an end, but neither did they have me in the brig or discover it was me, so a mixed defeat. Until the Deep Ones judge me for my failure, that is.

3 Likes