Other options are of course possible.
You could also be poisoned by a Pukka, though if so, you will die tonight. 
Iām slightly surprised to find myself still aliveā¦
Ooh, maybe @pillbox was a minion, and my Minstrel ability kicked in and EVERYBODY is drunk!!
1 Like
That would be hilarious. Well, apart from the dead ones. I am just glad I am not the first one deadā¦
1 Like
A professor trying to raise someone might well be a target for poisoning.
Leans over and whispers something to @Whistle_Pig
I am so utterly confused about everything.
I think we should not execute anyone today, just in case @Brattyjediās thought of a mastermind keeping the game going is correct.
The only ābadā role in this setup that can poison is the pukka, right? So for that, weād have to have a pukka that has managed to not poison then kill anyone multiple times. Possible I suppose, but Iād want to work out how that actually happened before Iād buy it. If it is the case, then our claimed professor would die tonight.
Really, for any claimed possible scenario of what might have happened most recently, Iād like to know how it also could explain the previous couple days/nights. Weāve got quite a bit of information with all the lacks of deaths. Surely we can work out a few options of what could have happened and what is impossible.
Iām willing to narrate a maximum of 4 different endings.
3 Likes
I exorcised @yashima again last night. This could look very suspiciousā¦ Or I could be drunk or or or
Well, I mean, everyone is suspicious. Except maybe @Whistle_Pig because the drowning failedāsorry about that. This should clear her unless she was protected by a Devilās Advocate. Oops, so still suspicious.
I mean if I were the demon, I would have known the first night I was exorcised who it was. But by the next night it was clear that there was a Tea Lady protecting the Exorcist and the Tea Lady would surely have died that night. After all that was the one night, I wasnāt exorcised. So I obviously would have targeted the Tea Lady and none of the roles at this table could have prevented me.
1 Like
Unless you were drunk?
Of course, unless I was drunk or poisoned. But that would also mean I would be dead by now because then the demon would have to be a Puka and it has been 2 nights and I am not dead. Or if for some reason (other than being the demon or the minion) one of you lied about their role and we have a Sailor or Innkeeper? Now would be a very good time to tell the rest of us.
Okā¦
Night 0: storyteller died
Day 1: no execution attempted
Night 1: no deaths
Day 2: WhistlePig attempted execution - did not die
Night 2: no deaths
Day 3: Pillbox executed
Night 3: no deaths
Day 4: Hi! What are we doing?
BrattyJedi - claimed TeaLady - might have prevented WhistlePig death day 2 if both Chewy77 and WhistlePig good
WhistlePig - claimed exorcist - claimed picked Yashima then Pillbox then Yashima
COMaestro - claimed Minstrel - would have everyone drunk now if Pillbox was minion
Yashima - no claimed role
Geebizzle - claimed Professor - claimed tried to use one time ability to bring back Pillbox and nothing happened. Could mean Geebizzle drunk/ poisoned or lying, or Pillbox evil
Pillbox - no claimed role
Chewy77 - claimed Pacifist - possibly stopped WhistlePig death but would have overlapped with TeaLady as would have still made both neighbors good. Did nothing on Pillbox which means nothing as is a āmayā ability.
Did I miss something or screw up?
Iām still leaning towards night one Pillbox demon targeted one of my neighbors and was blocked. Night two WhistlePig Exorcist blocked Pillbox demon. Night three demon was dead. Now we have a Mastermind keeping the game going.
Iām probably 100% wrong and messing up badly by fixating on one possible explanation and not looking for other explanations. Someone else come up with another explanation that makes sense!
1 Like
So my chums. Anyone nominating?
Without sounding too demonish. I suggest we donāt nominate me as we could learn more if I die tonight by demon attack, I think.
1 Like
I have words to add to the analysis above that I did claim a role via drawing but apparently that did not get noticed. (Iām on phone forcing brevity more than usual and will be until Sunday night when weāre back homeāI truly had not realized what traveling means for my online time, I havenāt traveled for so long. My apologies to everyone for being so absent)
I agree that nominating Gee would be counter productive.
I asked if you were hinting at a role in your drawing then in a later comment named the role I thought you might be hinting at. I never got a response from you to that that I saw.
1 Like
Ah well I thought I had written something in regards to that. Sorry about the confusion.
Wait so which is it? You thought no one noticed your drawing or you knew I had noticed it and commented on it and you thought you had replied to me?
And I know you said you are traveling and can only make brief comments, but youāve made two comments now about how you tried to claim a role before and in neither of them do you name the role. It would take less than a full sentence to name the role you meant to claim in your drawing. Do you want the rest of us to know your role or not?
Iām starting to get very suspicious and I donāt know if that is warranted or just miscommunication because of the traveling.