2026-04-16T18:03:16Z
I can’t argue with them but it’s a game that somehow has never quite clicked with me. (This is one of the many reasons I’m not part of a successful boardgame review channel.)
I really enjoy the format of the top 100, but mam fach I struggled with the editing in this one. It’s like watching We Will Rock You (not a compliment).
I understand that their ranking criteria are, roughly speaking, vibes, but it’s hard to get invested. We’re a few episodes in and I’m prepared to ignore the entire list, however it ends up looking.
I suspect I’d have a lot more sympathy if they’d called it “games that are no longer the new hotness but we want to talk about anyway”.
Azul (“the tile game”) is the game from my collection most requested by my parents, along with Railroad Ink (“the train game”).
Their observation about the “meanness” of Azul compared to other similar games is a good one. It’s neat that it’s definitely optional, but much more prevalent than in its peers if you want it to be.
I’ve been playing a lot of Harmonies and while it’s possible to take some tiles that someone else wants it’s nowhere near as common for it to make a dent on their final score. Usually they’ll be able to find the tiles they want later which means playing aggressively doesn’t have a real incentive. Whereas Azul does allow you to plan out what your opponent is likely to take and find a way to leave them holding the bag at the end.
If nothing else this video reminded me I should probably play Azul again but I do wonder if I should get rid of my copy for the travel edition.