Recent Boardgames (Your Last Played Game Volume 2)

After playing that BGA game, I really regret not jumping the opportunity I had to get it right at the beginning of my descent into the hobby. Had I only known… I hope there’s a reprint!


Got another game of viticulture in it’s starting to click. It’s a real nice length with some good, light strategy play.

Was close this time I just eeked out a win 24 - 23.


Halfway through a game of food chain magnate. I was doing so well!!! Until someone undercut my burger racket. Now I have no money, am firing everyone every turn and the only thing I can do is hire a whole bunch of waitresses to try and find new staff. Planning on creating a massive marketing and cooking drive to try and overload everyone… but there’s no way that will work. I’m screwed :cry:

Forgot how much I love the game though!


It was so painful. Second half of the game I could only set up for the next turn, so maybe could 1 thing every 2 turns, while everyone else was doing 3 or 4 things a turn. :pleading_face:

So I flooded the market with burgers so at least the game would end sooner :grinning_face_with_smiling_eyes:

In retrospect I should have got the discount manager the moment someone used it to compete with me, but instead I was focusing on production and marketing… Which I then couldn’t sell.

(The plus side of TTS is you can secretly read a book when you can’t concede but you can’t do anything.)


In honor of the recent Mars landing we played a round of Terraforming Mars today (on Hellas because that is closest to where Perseverance landed). The only other expansion we included was Prelude because my partner hasn’t played in a while. Despite that he won by 82 over 78 points. I messed up my VP generation and he specialized in plants…

After that we played another round of Space Base with dummy rolls and it was much rejoicing because I had pushed two sectors that kept coming up and then through some clever action combining double scored 9 VP in sector twelve and bought a few colonies for a quick win :slight_smile:


17 posts were split to a new topic: Who’s First? –⁠ First Player and Tie Breaker Rules

I’m glad to see you gave the dummy rolls a try, what did you think? In my opinion it goes a long way to reclaiming the gambl-y jackpot feel you get at a full table.


It went much faster because one quickly has more income than one knows what to do with. I think one should also remove cards from the market by some random(?) mechanism at the same time.

Overall, I think we’re keeping them.

1 Like

My wife and I played two games of Ticket to Ride: London today. I won the first by a good margin, thanks to an 11 point ticket and a missed ticket on her part. She won the second by 4 points, from the 1 point and 3 point connection bonuses.

Combined, the two games took the better part of an hour, but a good chunk of that was taking care of the kids, so actual gameplay, including set up and put away, was closer to 30 minutes. It is still nice being able to get the TtR experience in such a short timeframe.


I had a couple of games of Crokinole, its pretty addictive


Made some more progress on out 10x10 with a couple rounds of Rallyman GT. We notice fewer mistakes each time we play, and this is the first time we both felt that we were completely on top of it.

I was inspired by @Mintochris and his Arkham Horror painting blitz, so I’ve set up Path to Carcosa with Roland, Pete and Duke to play solo over the week. I fully anticipate losing my mind.


I set up Forbidden Stars this afternoon for a two-handed solo game (not at all recommended, just had the itch), but I only finally got to sit down with it this evening, and got about halfway before calling it a night. It’s been long enough since my first (and only) play of this game that it’s basically a learning game, but I’m happy the mechanics clicked back in fast because wow it’s a lot to manage. On the upside, there isn’t a chance in hell I can remember my own actions let alone my “other player’s”, so there’s plenty of surprise still in the reveals. :sweat_smile:

It’s the Space Marines vs. the Chaos Space Marines (oh Warhammer) on the default setup to speed things along. The World Eaters (Chaos) took an early hit and lost a space marine unit in a far corner to an orbital strike, and the Ultramarines were able to push quickly into a sector with an objective. They opted for speed over power though, and all units were lost in the fracas; the objective was now undefended, however.

In the next round, The World Eaters were able to use their special ability to quickly gain presence in the system with a cultist, and plugged up the action stack there, forcing the Marines to take a turn in a different sector and later to skip a turn altogether. Although the Marines managed to control the planet and objective early in the round, The World Eaters reclaimed it in a decisive victory.

As it stands, it’s a bit of a stalemate, but Chaos has managed to buff their actions and deck, while the Marines have a fairly strong ground army in striking distance of the objective already. It’s anyone’s game.

I wouldn’t recommend anyone attempt this with this particular game, but I have to admit I’m having a stupidly good time scrapping myself. We’ll see if I get time to finish tomorrow.


The back half is complete, and it ended in a WILD upset.

The centre left of the board was the battleground for the following two rounds and while The World Eaters made it a grind for their aggressors, eventually they fell and the first objective went to the Ultramarines. Combat went to morale checks however, and the Chaos army was able to make a really juicy retreat back into friendly territory. This offered a blockade against the Marines’ advance, and gave them a good path to their own objective.

What came next was just a ruthless steamroller from the Ultramarines. The World Eaters were beaten down to a scattered collection of cultists by round 8, and things were looking pretty hopeless. The Ultramarines managed a few catastrophic flubs (including a zero-hit orbital strike with 7 dice!), but these felt inconsequential.

…at least at first. On the final Imperial assault for their game-winning objective, Chaos was able to turtle down with a meagre collection of cultists, but landed the right cards and dice to keep from getting routed and sent their assailants packing. What’s more, they were able to spread a few cultists to the wind during the combat, and the final two turns were theirs.

The World Eaters were able to pop out a cheap ship, linking them to a now very lightly defended objective token with a legal path for ground units. They used an upgrade ability to buy a discounted Titan, got a free cultist conversion into a Chaos Space Marine, marched on over to their ultimate destiny aaaaaaaaaaand… just kinda sat there. The Ultramarines had no choice but to amass as much defense as possible, so the city-sized death machine just kinda picked its butt, mostly free to play morale cards and watch the opposition concede.

Very unexpectedly, Chaos managed to grab an objective on the very final turn of the game. This forced a tiebreaker, and with the cultists mostly being allowed to “pollinate” in the final rounds of the game, The World Eaters won by having a single friendly planet more than the Ultramarines.

I’m going to end up doing this again. I could write a novel about the nonsense in this game. :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:


I rejoined our Monday Game Night after a small Covid scare last week and played two games.

Pan-Am, which I really enjoyed, if a bit unpredictable, it was a good light network + economy euro. And funny enough, the theme was quite interesting too. I am glad they don’t delve in the '77 Tenerife accident, that would have been unpleasant. Finished last out of 4, but didn’t mind. Would happily replay. Even though it has yet another map where NZ does not appear. At least they took out the Aussies too. :slight_smile:

And then we went on to play Great Western Trail between 3. And even though the first hour two of us didn’t have a clue of what was going on, towards the second half of the game I started enjoying it myself. I think it suffer from a little bit of Monopoly syndrome (cash in by Start, sort of) and overuse of symbols and icons that on your first play look like Egyptian hieroglyphs. I think it is a game that could do with an artistic remake, tbh. We were getting to quite late in the evening, so we didn’t count up VPs in the end (it was either that or tidying up well after 10.30 pm, and the host kindly reminded us what time it was), but I enjoyed it to a degree that I would not have minded winning, losing or anything else… Definitely not a game to finish the night, perhaps better as an opener. Looking at its position on the top 100, it left me scratching my head a little bit. I’d rather play any Brass over this.

So after two very American euros, called it a night.


The whole perspective of the map throws me off.

Interesting, I did quite enjoyed that it was not the usual “Risk” map. Although I can see how it could test some people’s geography (as it did in our game), it is very unusual to have the North Pole in the centre.

Funny you should mention that. How about a second edition with at this time unknown artistic changes and minor rules changes in 2021 followed by versions with rules variations (unknown exactly how) set in Argentina in 2022 and in New Zealand in 2023?

1 Like

Actually, that came up on conversation during the game. It will be interesting to see how they deal with the “tepees” both in the Argentinian and Kiwi versions. If they are going to put Pahs and the Treaty of Waitangi, that could stir some controversy very quickly…

The art of the game (as opposed to the box) is one of the things that first drew me to it, so I’m curious but not overly excited about the new edition’s art. (Rails to the North, on the other hand, I haven’t bought mostly because of the art.) I found the symbols quite easy to parse (quite a feat of graphic design, I thought!), but that seems to be different for me in many games.

Play it more, and I think you’ll find that the money you get in Kansas City is only half the money equation. Sure, it probably powers one big buy each time around the board, but it’s the little bits you collect along the way that will be the difference between two good players.

I didn’t get the impression from the very little information available that the games will be quite that similar. Given Pfister’s track record, I’d actually expect indigenous peoples whitewashed out of the sequels. They’re just not as “glamorous” as the Indians in classic Westerns.

1 Like

I was taking more that approach, but at a rate that the other two players going through Kansas at nearly twice the rate I was going put the end game forward a lot earlier than I expected. We just managed to get the train to about position 10-11, and I only had 3 cowboys and two workers. Which made me wonder how can you manage to fill that grid, or get so far on the train bit.

Anyway, would not refuse a replay, but left me a bit cold.

Yeah, the game ends fast. Once you know the pace, though, it gets easier to measure out what might have value and what doesn’t.

You cannot fill the grid. If you do, something is wrong. Even filling one row takes some concentration.

Hitting the end with the train means you got engineers at just the right moment, you got lucky with a poor deck of cards, and you knew how to use those advantages. It’s also a lot easier when there are more locomotives, because you start out having fewer spaces to move. (But it is such a glorious feeling when you hit the end and your opponents are trying to figure out how to simultaneously jaw-drop and teeth-grind! :blush:)

Edit: The first year it was out, I played it mostly two-player, and about half the time, we’d agree to artificially prolong the game by alternating employee rows 2-3-2-3. But then we realized we were “getting soft”. So we went back to the rules as written, and the game kicked our butts for a while again.