# Star Trek Ascendancy game 6

**URL:** <https://discussion.tekeli.li/t/star-trek-ascendancy-game-6/3932>\
**Category:** Play by Post\
**Created:** [6 March 2022 17:24 UTC](https://discussion.tekeli.li/t/star-trek-ascendancy-game-6/3932 "2022-03-06T17:24:41Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RogerBW](https://discussion.tekeli.li/user_avatar/discussion.tekeli.li/rogerbw/32/3_2.png) [@RogerBW](https://discussion.tekeli.li/u/RogerBW)\
**Post date:** [6 March 2022 17:24 UTC](https://discussion.tekeli.li/t/star-trek-ascendancy-game-6/3932/1 "2022-03-06T17:24:41Z")

</div>

Rules:

> **[The Unofficial Complete Rulebook for Star Trek: Ascendancy | Star Trek:...](https://boardgamegeek.com/filepage/159987/unofficial-complete-rulebook-star-trek-ascendancy)**
>
> The Unofficial Complete Rulebook for Star Trek: Ascendancy | Star Trek: Ascendancy

Chat thread:

> [@Star Trek Ascendancy (recruitment)](https://discussion.tekeli.li/t/star-trek-ascendancy-recruitment/3156/):
>
> They said it couldn’t be done! (Actually they assumed I had enough sense to notice that for myself.) But here in principle we have a workable map in Inkscape: [g998] “Workable” in the sense that the warp lanes have triangles attached at the ends (you can see black slanting lines at the corners), the points of which can auto-snap to the hidden square at the centre of each system tile. And I think that may be the most technically challenging bit to do. There’s more prep work to do, but in pri…

Players: @Canadian_Errant @Carletto80 @Delwayne @Lordof1 @RossM please make sure you’re “watching” this thread. Shortly I will also set up a private message thread.

Poll result for Humble Beginnings, and no Borg. This will be a standard “open” game.

Randomly generated faction choice order:

1. @Delwayne
2. Lordof1
3. RossM
4. Canadian\_Errant
5. Carletto80

In that order, please choose from among:

- Andorian
- Cardassian
- Federation
- Ferengi
- Klingon
- Romulan
- Vulcan

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RogerBW](https://discussion.tekeli.li/user_avatar/discussion.tekeli.li/rogerbw/32/3_2.png) [@RogerBW](https://discussion.tekeli.li/u/RogerBW)\
**Post date:** [31 March 2022 08:20 UTC](https://discussion.tekeli.li/t/star-trek-ascendancy-game-6/3932/2 "2022-03-31T08:20:27Z")

</div>

Split this topic on 31 March 2022 08:20 UTC

409 posts were merged into an existing topic: [Star Trek Ascendancy (recruitment)](https://discussion.tekeli.li/t/star-trek-ascendancy-recruitment/3156)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RogerBW](https://discussion.tekeli.li/user_avatar/discussion.tekeli.li/rogerbw/32/3_2.png) [@RogerBW](https://discussion.tekeli.li/u/RogerBW)\
**Post date:** [27 March 2022 08:11 UTC](https://discussion.tekeli.li/t/star-trek-ascendancy-game-6/3932/342 "2022-03-27T08:11:07Z")

</div>

Split this topic on 27 March 2022 08:11 UTC

2 posts were merged into an existing topic: [Star Trek Ascendancy (recruitment)](https://discussion.tekeli.li/t/star-trek-ascendancy-recruitment/3156/438)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RogerBW](https://discussion.tekeli.li/user_avatar/discussion.tekeli.li/rogerbw/32/3_2.png) [@RogerBW](https://discussion.tekeli.li/u/RogerBW)\
**Post date:** [30 March 2022 09:54 UTC](https://discussion.tekeli.li/t/star-trek-ascendancy-game-6/3932/409 "2022-03-30T09:54:15Z")

</div>

Split this topic on 30 March 2022 09:54 UTC

13 posts were merged into an existing topic: [Star Trek Ascendancy (recruitment)](https://discussion.tekeli.li/t/star-trek-ascendancy-recruitment/3156/443)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RogerBW](https://discussion.tekeli.li/user_avatar/discussion.tekeli.li/rogerbw/32/3_2.png) [@RogerBW](https://discussion.tekeli.li/u/RogerBW)\
**Post date:** [31 March 2022 08:20 UTC](https://discussion.tekeli.li/t/star-trek-ascendancy-game-6/3932/410 "2022-03-31T08:20:27Z")

</div>

Closed on 31 March 2022 08:20 UTC



---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Delwayne](https://discussion.tekeli.li/user_avatar/discussion.tekeli.li/delwayne/32/24668_2.png) [@Delwayne](https://discussion.tekeli.li/u/Delwayne)\
**Post date:** [31 March 2022 04:20 UTC](https://discussion.tekeli.li/t/star-trek-ascendancy-game-6/3932/411 "2022-03-31T04:20:14Z")

</div>

Vulcan:

Build 6 ships.  
upgrade shields.  
c1,c2) fleet 2 will pick up 2 ships and go in and out of warp to the Black Hole. If successful (after re-rolls, put research to Ministry Project).

c3, c4) move fleet 1 by impulse to Vulcan. Pickup 2 ships and go into warp.

c5) fleet 3 will come out of warp to Vulcan.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RogerBW](https://discussion.tekeli.li/user_avatar/discussion.tekeli.li/rogerbw/32/3_2.png) [@RogerBW](https://discussion.tekeli.li/u/RogerBW)\
**Post date:** [31 March 2022 08:21 UTC](https://discussion.tekeli.li/t/star-trek-ascendancy-game-6/3932/412 "2022-03-31T08:21:02Z")

</div>

Opened on 31 March 2022 08:21 UTC



---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RogerBW](https://discussion.tekeli.li/user_avatar/discussion.tekeli.li/rogerbw/32/3_2.png) [@RogerBW](https://discussion.tekeli.li/u/RogerBW)\
**Post date:** [6 March 2022 17:24 UTC](https://discussion.tekeli.li/t/star-trek-ascendancy-game-6/3932/413 "2022-03-06T17:24:41Z")

</div>

Rules:

> **[The Unofficial Complete Rulebook for Star Trek: Ascendancy | Star Trek:...](https://boardgamegeek.com/filepage/159987/unofficial-complete-rulebook-star-trek-ascendancy)**
>
> The Unofficial Complete Rulebook for Star Trek: Ascendancy | Star Trek: Ascendancy

Chat thread:

> [@Star Trek Ascendancy (recruitment)](https://discussion.tekeli.li/t/star-trek-ascendancy-recruitment/3156/):
>
> They said it couldn’t be done! (Actually they assumed I had enough sense to notice that for myself.) But here in principle we have a workable map in Inkscape: [g998] “Workable” in the sense that the warp lanes have triangles attached at the ends (you can see black slanting lines at the corners), the points of which can auto-snap to the hidden square at the centre of each system tile. And I think that may be the most technically challenging bit to do. There’s more prep work to do, but in pri…

Players: @Canadian_Errant @Carletto80 @Delwayne @Lordof1 @RossM please make sure you’re “watching” this thread. Shortly I will also set up a private message thread.

Poll result for Humble Beginnings, and no Borg. This will be a standard “open” game.

Randomly generated faction choice order:

1. @Delwayne
2. Lordof1
3. RossM
4. Canadian\_Errant
5. Carletto80

In that order, please choose from among:

- Andorian
- Cardassian
- Federation
- Ferengi
- Klingon
- Romulan
- Vulcan

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Delwayne](https://discussion.tekeli.li/user_avatar/discussion.tekeli.li/delwayne/32/24668_2.png) [@Delwayne](https://discussion.tekeli.li/u/Delwayne)\
**Post date:** [6 March 2022 23:26 UTC](https://discussion.tekeli.li/t/star-trek-ascendancy-game-6/3932/414 "2022-03-06T23:26:10Z")

</div>

Oh. Okay, if I choose first, I will accept Romulan.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RogerBW](https://discussion.tekeli.li/user_avatar/discussion.tekeli.li/rogerbw/32/3_2.png) [@RogerBW](https://discussion.tekeli.li/u/RogerBW)\
**Post date:** [6 March 2022 23:41 UTC](https://discussion.tekeli.li/t/star-trek-ascendancy-game-6/3932/415 "2022-03-06T23:41:52Z")

</div>

@Lordof1 to pick next.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lordof1](https://discussion.tekeli.li/user_avatar/discussion.tekeli.li/lordof1/32/5_2.png) [@Lordof1](https://discussion.tekeli.li/u/Lordof1)\
**Post date:** [7 March 2022 00:19 UTC](https://discussion.tekeli.li/t/star-trek-ascendancy-game-6/3932/416 "2022-03-07T00:19:33Z")

</div>

I have a soft spot for the Klingons.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RogerBW](https://discussion.tekeli.li/user_avatar/discussion.tekeli.li/rogerbw/32/3_2.png) [@RogerBW](https://discussion.tekeli.li/u/RogerBW)\
**Post date:** [7 March 2022 09:17 UTC](https://discussion.tekeli.li/t/star-trek-ascendancy-game-6/3932/417 "2022-03-07T09:17:32Z")

</div>

@RossM next.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Delwayne](https://discussion.tekeli.li/user_avatar/discussion.tekeli.li/delwayne/32/24668_2.png) [@Delwayne](https://discussion.tekeli.li/u/Delwayne)\
**Post date:** [7 March 2022 10:55 UTC](https://discussion.tekeli.li/t/star-trek-ascendancy-game-6/3932/418 "2022-03-07T10:55:08Z")

</div>

In my games, I’ll only include Vulcan if we have 7 players. Otherwise, they are not an option to pick.  
Our game yesterday (at convention) once again confirmed that.  
Is that something here we could all agree to?  
(Roger tends to let his players decide. So it is our call). If you have played with the Vulcan faction in a game you’d understand. They tend to unbalance the game a tiny bit.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RossM](https://discussion.tekeli.li/user_avatar/discussion.tekeli.li/rossm/32/1021_2.png) [@RossM](https://discussion.tekeli.li/u/RossM)\
**Post date:** [7 March 2022 11:40 UTC](https://discussion.tekeli.li/t/star-trek-ascendancy-game-6/3932/419 "2022-03-07T11:40:56Z")

</div>

I was going to plump for Vulcans.

Because Having one ascendancy and a warp token from the start is huge.

What do we think?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RogerBW](https://discussion.tekeli.li/user_avatar/discussion.tekeli.li/rogerbw/32/3_2.png) [@RogerBW](https://discussion.tekeli.li/u/RogerBW)\
**Post date:** [7 March 2022 11:43 UTC](https://discussion.tekeli.li/t/star-trek-ascendancy-game-6/3932/420 "2022-03-07T11:43:22Z")

</div>

My problem with the Vulcans is that the difficulty of their objectives is hugely variable. That said, I don’t mind having them in the game.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Delwayne](https://discussion.tekeli.li/user_avatar/discussion.tekeli.li/delwayne/32/24668_2.png) [@Delwayne](https://discussion.tekeli.li/u/Delwayne)\
**Post date:** [7 March 2022 11:44 UTC](https://discussion.tekeli.li/t/star-trek-ascendancy-game-6/3932/421 "2022-03-07T11:44:24Z")

</div>

But it is hidden and if I’m not mistaken, they start with 3 Ascendency?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RossM](https://discussion.tekeli.li/user_avatar/discussion.tekeli.li/rossm/32/1021_2.png) [@RossM](https://discussion.tekeli.li/u/RossM)\
**Post date:** [7 March 2022 11:48 UTC](https://discussion.tekeli.li/t/star-trek-ascendancy-game-6/3932/422 "2022-03-07T11:48:49Z")

</div>

They do. Having even 1 is what I meant. 2 objectives. 1 public and 1 private.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Delwayne](https://discussion.tekeli.li/user_avatar/discussion.tekeli.li/delwayne/32/24668_2.png) [@Delwayne](https://discussion.tekeli.li/u/Delwayne)\
**Post date:** [7 March 2022 11:55 UTC](https://discussion.tekeli.li/t/star-trek-ascendancy-game-6/3932/423 "2022-03-07T11:55:16Z")

</div>

Shall we decide? Do you want Vulcans in this game?

_Poll ([view on site](https://discussion.tekeli.li/t/star-trek-ascendancy-game-6/3932/423))_

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RogerBW](https://discussion.tekeli.li/user_avatar/discussion.tekeli.li/rogerbw/32/3_2.png) [@RogerBW](https://discussion.tekeli.li/u/RogerBW)\
**Post date:** [7 March 2022 11:56 UTC](https://discussion.tekeli.li/t/star-trek-ascendancy-game-6/3932/424 "2022-03-07T11:56:28Z")

</div>

I really don’t see a problem with having the Vulcans as long as other players are aware of what their objectives can be.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Delwayne](https://discussion.tekeli.li/user_avatar/discussion.tekeli.li/delwayne/32/24668_2.png) [@Delwayne](https://discussion.tekeli.li/u/Delwayne)\
**Post date:** [7 March 2022 11:58 UTC](https://discussion.tekeli.li/t/star-trek-ascendancy-game-6/3932/425 "2022-03-07T11:58:41Z")

</div>

It’s really player experience. New players who have never had them in a game would not care. But if all players have seen them in action, then they would have a better understanding. So, it is just a choice.

[Next page](https://discussion.tekeli.li/t/star-trek-ascendancy-game-6/3932.md?page=2)
