It’s my usual silliness in 18xx where I don’t pay attention to turn order and so I was last on the turn order and y’all took all the remaining companies.
3 Likes
I’m interested to try 1846 and 1862. My understanding is that 1862 is better than 1889 but longer/more complex so I don’t know if it will go as well on 18xx.games.
I’m looking at January, just a break and knowing that there will be a lot of downtime as we approach the holidays.
2 Likes
1862 is better. But it’s also weirder. And 1846 is pretty weird to start with.
I’m game for both or either. And January would be a good timeframe for me, as well.
1 Like
Contemplating 18xx.games again. Looking to be active weekdays during the US “business hours”, e.g. 3:00:00 PM→9:00:00 PM
Looking for interest here before looking at other alternatives that will, likely, require the use of Discord
1 Like
Depends. Which game?
1 Like
I’m open. Probably nothing in Alpha/Beta, because who has time for bugs?
Probably not '89 because I’ve played that enough. And probably not '30 because I don’t appreciate classics (or it’s too similar to '89, which I’ve played enough)
And probably not '17 or '22 because they might run a month or two too long.
1 Like
If I had to highlight some options, I’d say:
1848
1860
1862
1880
18GB
18Ireland
2 Likes
I will put '62 at the bottom of the list for reasons.
We can even play '60 with 2 players
2 Likes
I could be tugged into another 1846 but I don’t have capacity to tackle another rulebook right now.
2 Likes
I’m good with a game of 1846.
I’d also be willing to run 2-player 1860 on the side, too because I’m eager to get that one played.
3 Likes
Well, I had hoped to get an important project at work wrapped up this week, but it just hasn’t happened. But it’s getting close. I’ll probably open the games on Monday unless someone beats me to it
2 Likes
Invite links:
1846 on 18xx.games (3-5 players, Optional rules: none)
1860 on 18xx.games (2-3 players, Optional rules: smaller map)
Joined on both
2 Likes